Skip to main content

The submittal review cycle

93 viewsUpdated 18/09/20261 min read

A submittal goes out, comes back with a response, and either passes or goes round again. The register's job is to make the current position of every item readable at a glance.

This topic includes:

The statuses

StatusMeans
RequiredThe specification demands it; nobody has produced it yet
DraftBeing prepared on your side
OpenIssued and under review
ClosedReviewed and finished with
VoidNo longer required

Required is the status that earns its keep. Loading the spec book creates a list of what has to be submitted before anybody has submitted anything, which turns the register into a procurement checklist rather than a record of what already happened.

The submittal register Number, title, spec section, type, status and who owes what.

Recording a review response

Open the item and record the reviewer's response against it.

A submittal open The item's history, its attachments, and the response recorded against it.

Responses follow the usual convention — approved, approved as noted, revise and resubmit, rejected. Attach the marked-up returned copy; in a dispute two years later, the annotation is the evidence, not the status.

Revisions

A submittal that comes back for revision does not become a new submittal. The revision number increments and the history stays on the same item, so the whole sequence — what was submitted, what was said, what changed — reads in one place.

Was this article helpful?

Let us know how we can improve our documentation.